City Demographic Trends and Population Analysis
Analyzing the demographic shifts of a community provides critical insights into its social and economic evolution. Over the last several decades, this city has experienced a consistent decline in population, reflecting broader trends of rural migration or urban contraction. By examining data from the U.S. Decennial Census, we can trace the changes in population density, household structures, and age distribution.
Key Facts
- Population Decline: The population dropped from 100 residents in 1960 to an estimated 39 in 2022.
- Racial Composition: As of 2010, the city was 100% White.
- Aging Population: The median age rose significantly from 36 years in 2000 to 52.5 years in 2010.
- Household Shift: Non-family households became the majority by 2010, accounting for 53.8% of all homes.
- Gender Balance: In 2010, the population was 56.5% male and 43.5% female.
Population Trends (1960–2022)
The city has seen a steady downward trend in its resident count over the past 60 years. The most significant drops occurred between 1980 and 2010, with the population falling from 97 to 46 during that window. Recent estimates suggest the decline is continuing, albeit at a slower pace.
| Census Year | Population | Percentage Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 100 | — |
| 1970 | 99 | −1.0% |
| 1980 | 97 | −2.0% |
| 1990 | 77 | −20.6% |
| 2000 | 62 | −19.5% |
| 2010 | 46 | −25.8% |
| 2020 | 40 | −13.0% |
| 2022 (est.) | 39 | −2.5% |
[ไม่มีภาพประกอบ]
Detailed Census Analysis
2010 Census Findings
By 2010, the city had a population of 46 people living in 26 households. The population density—the number of people living per unit of area—was 46.5 inhabitants per square mile. The community was entirely White (100%).
Household dynamics shifted toward smaller, non-family units. Non-families made up 53.8% of households, and 46.2% of all households consisted of individuals living alone. Notably, 19.2% of these single-person households were residents aged 65 or older. The average household size was 1.77, while the average family size was 2.42.
The age distribution showed a maturing population, with a median age of 52.5 years. Half of the residents (50%) fell within the 45 to 64 age bracket, while only 6.5% were under the age of 18.
2000 Census Findings
In 2000, the population was larger at 62 people with a population density of 62.4 inhabitants per square mile. The racial makeup was more diverse than in 2010, consisting of 95.16% White, 1.61% Native American, 1.61% from other races, and 1.61% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino residents accounted for 1.61% of the population.
The household structure in 2000 was more family-oriented, with 30.8% of households including children under 18. The median age was significantly lower at 36 years. Gender distribution was skewed, with 158.3 males for every 100 females.
Economic Indicators (2000)
Economic data from the 2000 census revealed a median household income of $30,000 and a median family income of $36,250. There was a slight gender pay gap, with males earning a median income of $35,833 compared to $33,750 for females. The per capita income—the average income earned per person—was $16,211.
Poverty levels were notable, with 20.0% of families and 22.2% of the total population living below the poverty line. This included 22.2% of residents aged 64 and older, while no residents under 18 were reported below the poverty line.
Frequently Asked Questions
How has the population changed since 1960?
The population has declined steadily from 100 residents in 1960 to an estimated 39 residents in 2022.
What was the racial makeup of the city in 2010?
According to the 2010 census, the racial makeup of the city was 100.0% White.
How did the median age change between 2000 and 2010?
The median age increased from 36 years in 2000 to 52.5 years in 2010, indicating a significant aging of the resident population.
What was the poverty rate in 2000?
In 2000, 22.2% of the total population and 20.0% of families were living below the poverty line.
What was the gender ratio in 2000?
In 2000, there were 158.3 males for every 100 females in the city.