City Demographics and Population Trends: A Historical Analysis
Analyzing the demographic shifts of a community provides vital insights into its social and economic evolution. By examining census data spanning nearly a century, we can observe how population size, household structures, and age distributions change over time. This report details the demographic trajectory of the city, highlighting a period of growth followed by a steady decline.
Key Facts
- Peak Population: The city reached its highest recorded population of 183 residents in 1950.
- Recent Trend: There has been a consistent population decline since 1980, with an estimated population of 55 by 2022.
- Racial Composition: The city is predominantly White, recorded at 99.06% in 2000 and 100% in 2010.
- Age Profile: The median age has risen from 43 years in 2000 to 47 years in 2010.
- Household Shift: Non-family households increased from 48.1% in 2000 to 60.5% in 2010.
Population History and Growth Trends
The city's population experienced significant fluctuations throughout the 20th century. Starting at 138 residents in 1930, the population grew steadily, peaking in 1950. However, the latter half of the century saw a sharp decline, most notably between 1960 and 1970, where the population dropped by 42.9%.
While there was a brief recovery between 1970 and 1990, the population has since trended downward. By the 2020 Census, the population had fallen to 59, with a further estimated decrease to 55 by 2022.
| Census Year | Population | Percentage Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1930 | 138 | — |
| 1940 | 164 | 18.8% |
| 1950 | 183 | 11.6% |
| 1960 | 168 | −8.2% |
| 1970 | 96 | −42.9% |
| 1980 | 116 | 20.8% |
| 1990 | 117 | 0.9% |
| 2000 | 106 | −9.4% |
| 2010 | 66 | −37.7% |
| 2020 | 59 | −10.6% |
| 2022 (est.) | 55 | −6.8% |
ไม่มีภาพประกอบ
Detailed Census Analysis
2010 Census Findings
As of 2010, the city had 66 residents across 38 households and 15 families. The population density—the number of people living per unit of area—was 253.8 inhabitants per square mile. There were 53 housing units, resulting in a density of 203.8 units per square mile.
The social structure was characterized by a high percentage of non-family households (60.5%) and individuals living alone (57.9%). Notably, 23.7% of all households consisted of a person aged 65 or older living alone. The average household size was 1.74, while the average family size was 2.73.
The gender distribution was 54.5% male and 45.5% female. The age distribution showed that 27.3% of the population was 65 years or older, the largest age bracket in the city.
2000 Census Findings
In 2000, the population was larger, with 106 people and 52 households. The population density was significantly lower at 52.7 inhabitants per square mile. The racial makeup was 99.06% White and 0.94% from two or more races.
Household dynamics in 2000 showed a higher prevalence of married couples (46.2%) compared to 2010. The average household size was 2.04, and the average family size was 2.93. The gender ratio was skewed toward males, with 120.8 males for every 100 females.
Economic Indicators (2000)
Economic data from the 2000 census revealed a median household income of $17,500 and a median family income of $21,875. There was a gender pay gap, with males earning a median income of $21,250 compared to $17,917 for females. The per capita income—the average income earned per person—was $11,644.
Poverty levels affected 14.8% of families and 16.8% of the total population. Specifically, 17.2% of residents aged 64 and older lived below the poverty line, while no residents under 18 were recorded in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the highest population the city ever reached?
The city reached its peak population of 183 residents in 1950.
How has the median age changed between 2000 and 2010?
The median age increased from 43 years in 2000 to 47 years in 2010.
What was the racial composition of the city in 2010?
According to the 2010 census, the racial makeup of the city was 100.0% White.
What was the poverty rate for seniors in 2000?
In 2000, 17.2% of the population aged 64 and older lived below the poverty line.
How did the population density change between 2000 and 2010?
The population density increased significantly from 52.7 inhabitants per square mile in 2000 to 253.8 inhabitants per square mile in 2010.