High Court of Constabulary: A History of Jurisdiction and Tradition

High Court of Constabulary: A History of Jurisdiction and Tradition

The High Court of Constabulary represents a unique intersection of hereditary right and civic administration within the Scottish legal landscape. Much of what is known about this institution is preserved through the meticulous records of the Earls of Erroll, who hold the prestigious title of Lord High Constable as a hereditary right.

The Struggle for Jurisdiction

The history of the court is marked by a tension between hereditary authority and local governance. During the 16th century, the burgh magistrates of Edinburgh—specifically the Lord Provost and the bailies—expressed objections to the jurisdiction exercised by the Constabulary Court.

To resolve these disputes, the Earls of Erroll began appointing the burgh magistrates as Constables-depute. This arrangement allowed the hereditary office to maintain its formal standing while integrating the local administrative leaders into the court's operational structure.

Evolution into the Modern Era

Despite the shifts in local administration, the Lord High Constable continued to assert his jurisdictional claims well into the 19th century. As the role evolved, the appointment of deputies became tied to the presence of the Crown.

From the 19th century onward, the Sheriff of Edinburgh and the burgh magistrates of Edinburgh were appointed as Constables-depute specifically during periods when the Monarch of the United Kingdom was resident at the Palace of Holyroodhouse.

Key Facts

  • The Earls of Erroll hold the position of Lord High Constable as a hereditary right.
  • Conflict arose in the 16th century between the Constabulary Court and Edinburgh's burgh magistrates.
  • The Lord Provost and bailies were appointed as Constables-depute to mitigate jurisdictional objections.
  • The Sheriff of Edinburgh also served as a Constable-depute during royal residencies.
  • Jurisdictional activity became specifically linked to the Monarch's presence at the Palace of Holyroodhouse from the 19th century.
Summary of High Court of Constabulary Roles
Role Authority/Appointment Context/Period
Lord High Constable Hereditary (Earls of Erroll) Continuous
Constables-depute Burgh Magistrates (Lord Provost/Bailies) From the 16th Century
Constables-depute Sheriff of Edinburgh & Magistrates 19th Century (during Royal residency)

Frequently Asked Questions

Who holds the hereditary right to be Lord High Constable?

The position of Lord High Constable is held as a hereditary right by the Earls of Erroll.

Why were the burgh magistrates of Edinburgh appointed as Constables-depute?

They were appointed as deputies starting in the 16th century because the Lord Provost and bailies had objected to the jurisdiction of the Constabulary Court.

When did the Sheriff of Edinburgh serve as a Constable-depute?

The Sheriff of Edinburgh was appointed as a Constable-depute from the 19th century onwards, specifically when the Monarch of the United Kingdom resided at the Palace of Holyroodhouse.

What is the significance of the Palace of Holyroodhouse in this history?

The palace served as the trigger for the appointment of the Sheriff and burgh magistrates as Constables-depute during the 19th century, linking the court's activity to the Monarch's residency.

References

  1. Dickinson, W Croft (1953). Courts of Special Jurisdiction: An Introduction to Scottish Legal History. Vol. 20. Stair Society. pp. 396–397 – via HeinOnline.
  2. "Historic Earls and Earldoms of Scotland - Chapter IV - Earldom and Earls of Erroll - Section II". www.electricscotland.com. Electric Scotland. Retrieved 22 April 2017.
  3. Hannay, R.K. (1932). "Observations on the Officers of the Scottish Parliament". Juridical Review. 44 (125): 125–138.