Hyphenated Americanism: The Struggle for Identity and Loyalty (1890–1920)

Hyphenated Americanism: The Struggle for Identity and Loyalty (1890–1920)

Between 1890 and 1920, the United States grappled with a complex question of national identity: could a person be loyal to their adopted country while maintaining ties to their ancestral homeland? This tension manifested in the rise of the term hyphenated American, a label used to describe citizens who maintained dual cultural or national identities, such as German-Americans or Irish-Americans.

While the term appeared in print by 1889, it evolved into a derogatory slur by 1904. The debate reached a fever pitch during World War I, as political leaders questioned the primary loyalty of ethnic groups who retained close connections to Europe.

Key Facts

  • The term "hyphenated American" became common as a derogatory expression by 1904.
  • Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson were prominent critics of dual national identities.
  • "100 percent Americanism" was a movement demanding total assimilation into Anglo-American culture.
  • Critics argued that patriotism and the preservation of ancestral languages were not mutually exclusive.
  • The US national anthem has been translated into numerous immigrant languages, including German (1861) and Spanish (1919).

The Political Push for "100 Percent Americanism"

High-ranking government officials viewed the "hyphen" not as a bridge between cultures, but as a threat to national unity. In 1915, former President Theodore Roosevelt delivered a stark warning to the Knights of Columbus at Carnegie Hall. He distinguished between naturalized Americans (those born abroad who became citizens), whom he praised, and "hyphenated Americans," whom he claimed were not Americans at all.

Roosevelt argued that allowing the nation to become a "tangle of squabbling nationalities"—specifically mentioning German, Irish, English, French, Scandinavian, and Italian Americans—would lead the country to ruin. To Roosevelt, a "good American" was someone who was an American and nothing else.

President Woodrow Wilson shared this suspicion. In his Pueblo speech, Wilson used violent imagery to describe the concept, stating that any man carrying a hyphen carried a "dagger" ready to be plunged into the vitals of the Republic. This sentiment persisted into the 1920s, with the Wall Street Journal condemning "hyphenates" among the supporters of Robert M. La Follette Jr. and the Progressive Party.

Resistance and the Defense of Heritage

The demand for "100 percent Americanism" was met with significant pushback from White ethnic immigrants and their descendants. Many argued that this ideology was a thinly veiled demand for the complete adoption of Anglo-American culture—the cultural norms of English-speaking people of British descent—and the exclusive use of the English language.

One notable defense came from Bishop John Joseph Frederick Otto Zardetti. In his 1892 "Sermon on the Mother and the Bride," Zardetti defended the right of German-Americans to preserve their ancestral culture and language, arguing that doing so did not contradict their patriotism toward the United States.

This belief was further evidenced by the translation of "The Star-Spangled Banner." To encourage military service during the American Civil War, the national anthem was translated into German in 1861 and widely circulated. Other translations followed, including a Spanish version in 1919, as well as versions in Hebrew, Yiddish, Louisiana French, Irish, and Scottish Gaelic.

Some critics used satire to highlight the hypocrisy of the movement. In 1916, Edward Goldbeck of Minnesota wrote in the Minneapolis Journal that German-Americans would gladly "abandon the hyphen" as soon as Anglo-Americans did, sarcastically suggesting that those who viewed America as a "new England" should be the ones to leave.

Summary of Hyphenated Americanism Perspectives

Comparison of Ideologies (1890–1920)
Perspective Core Belief Key Proponents/Examples
Anti-Hyphenation Loyalty must be exclusive to the US; dual identity is a threat to the Republic. Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson
Cultural Preservation Ancestral language and heritage can coexist with American patriotism. Bishop Zardetti, Edward Goldbeck
Assimilationist True Americanism requires adopting Anglo-American/Protestant culture. John R. Rathom

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the term "hyphenated American" mean?

It refers to citizens who maintain a dual identity, combining their American nationality with their ancestral ethnic or national origin (e.g., German-American).

Who were the primary critics of hyphenated Americanism?

The most prominent critics were political leaders like Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, who believed that dual loyalties endangered the stability of the United States.

What was "100 percent Americanism"?

It was a movement that demanded total assimilation into American society, which critics argued specifically meant the adoption of White Anglo-Saxon Protestant culture and the English language.

How did immigrants prove their patriotism while keeping their language?

One significant example was the translation of the US national anthem into various immigrant languages, such as German and Spanish, allowing them to express loyalty to the US in their native tongues.

When did the term "hyphenated American" become derogatory?

While the term was published by 1889, it became commonly used as a derogatory term by 1904.

References

  1. Sarah Churchwell. America’s Original Identity Politics Archived June 4, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Review of Books, February 7, 2019
  2. Mary Anne Trasciatti. Hooking the Hyphen: Woodrow Wilson '5 War Rhetoric and the Italian American Community, p. 107. In: Beasley, Vanessa B. Who Belongs in America?: Presidents, Rhetoric, and Immigration. College Station: Texas A & M University Press, 2006.
  3. Carl. H. Chrislock (1991), The Watchdog of Loyalty: The Minnesota Commission of Public Safety during World War I, Minnesota Historical Society Press. pp. 1-39, 269-291.
  4. Yzermans, V.A. (1988). Frontier Bishop of Saint Cloud. Park Press. pp. 117–138.
  5. Carl. H. Chrislock (1991), The Watchdog of Loyalty: The Minnesota Commission of Public Safety during World War I, Minnesota Historical Society Press. pp. 21, 337.